Cult Hysteria!

By: General James Green

RECENTLY OUR CAMP WAS INVADED by a famous TV show camera crew and interviewer (such is common with us over the years, but most of us were out on mission, so the BIG "SCARE" had NO effect!!). Without going into too much detail about what was said and done, the interviewer asked one of our officers something like this: "You know people call you (ACMTC) a cult. Don't you think that is the worst thing you can be called?" Of course our people have been taught properly about what a cult is, so we always answer that being a cult or being called a cult does not bother us. We've learned to become impervious to that term. Sorry, "cult- catchers"!

"Cultists"

Some (usually self-appointed/self-righteous “Christians”) think that the quickest way to DESTROY any group (be it religious or secular) is to label it a "cult". In reality, this term has gone thru many changes over the years, as we have taken note. Once attacked by "cult-catchers" or branded a "cult", a group is marked as a THING to be feared and hated! We can certainly testify to this. And those in a "cult" are automatically judged as misguided, brainwashed, deceived, and usually dangerous. And, of course, the leader or leaders of a "cult" are assumed to have power-lust and devious motives and satanic intentions. Therefore, the majority usually and generally take it for granted that he, she, or they are a danger to society and must be stopped at all costs or killed!

Wow! That Sounds Like Jesus!

Yes, my dear scared "Christians", by the standards of all this "cult labeling", Jesus was a "cult" leader and His disciples were "cult" followers. Were not Jesus and troops labeled as such? They were! Was not Jesus hunted, slandered and finally killed by misguided and HATE-FILLED "cult-hunters"? He was. So were many of His disciples. So it is today.

It Is A Privilege

We count it a privilege to be called a "cult"-WE ARE A CULT OF THE LIVING GOD! Does that scare you? And we ARE armed and dangerous! I have a right arm and a left arm, and I have God's Sword of the Spirit as my weapon. Furthermore, I obediently follow my "cult" leader, Jesus Christ the Lord, and take His teachings seriously.

Oh, Yes, Let Us Not Forget Secrecy

We find it humorous that the folks (usually the insecure church folks) out there think we are so secretive. Sure! We've been public as a group since 1981, have gone to 50 countries (some many times over), have been seen on local/national/international TV, heard on radio, been seen and written about in newspapers and publications, have teams constantly working-OPENLY-all over the whole wide world; we publish what we believe, what we do and how we live, in millions of tracts/booklets, and also give out radio tapes and teaching videos; for years we never had a gate where we live, so any and all could visit (we currently have closed our camp to keep out vicious and hateful media folks); we've let family members visit (if they come in the right spirit-most do not!); and so on. So, my dear SCARED "cult catchers", where is our secrecy? There is NONE!

It erps our enemies that we do not allow them to come in and cause us trouble. But it is a concern to our well-being-we despise troublemakers!-and there are plenty of troublemakers out there that have NOTHING BETTER TO DO than monitor us and call us a "secret cult"-which means we won't allow the unwanted swine to run over us at will. The latest attack (TV show) was aimed to do just that--run over us and destroy us. When told to remove themselves from our peaceful camp, they scream that we are dangerous and aggressive!! So it be! Learn some manners before you pay us a visit.

Their Tactics

Mistrust and hostility usually escalates between the accusers and the accused-this is, of course, one of the Devil's tactics. All the harassment of a group is done in the name of "You are dangerous; we are good!"-you are good for nothing, my dear enemy, if you do not have better things to do, like live the Christian life and show better Christian fruit. You are no better than the enemies of old that hated Jesus and followers.

We DARE To Be Different!

Get used to it-we are not like the average church slave. We believe in being AGGRESSIVE ("active" is a better word so as not to scare our already frightened enemies!). We believe in living and doing the Gospel thing.

We dare to defy the backslid Church, especially here in the USA, and this does not sit well with the dull and dumb leadership or their backslid "saints".

Rewards Of Persecution

Oh, yes, there are blessed rewards for being persecuted for Jesus' sake. (You look up all the Biblical passages.) This latest attack caused a great interest in our organization. Our website was visited by lots and lots of curious folks-this is good!

For those of you who wrote and asked to visit/join, we are out on missions right now: please understand and be patient. Also, we are not an open community for everyone. We have a limited capacity here, for we are an International Headquarters only! We recommend you to start an ACMTC branch in your area/state/country. Our main task is to publish free reading/visual/audio materials, not to increase our camp by numbers. We do not play the "numbers" game. We have camps/libraries all around the world. You can start one of these; we'll supply freely.

Noble And Honest

Despite all the HATE that is aimed at us, we do try to be noble and honest in our work. But, again, we do not allow just anybody (or thing!) to come among us to cause trouble. Conversely, we make enemies because of our strong convictions. GET USED TO IT!! We realize, all too well, that this generates an enormous force of suspicious and judgmental folks, both in and out of the Church. We can't apologize.

Singled Out

Because we dare to dress, act, and do differently than the dull and dumb syndrome, we are constantly singled out and attacked. Read the life story of Jesus, His TRUE followers, the Church Fathers, and so on.

The Mob Behavior

Oh, yes, we've had the mobs, lots of them, trying to stop us. Sorry, we're still here! (Smile.)

It is no new thing. We still have Satan-inspired folks that cry out for our blood. All I can say is that we'll do God's work till He is finished with us. Until then, scream, cry, beg, curse on. Crazed mobs do not frighten us. Salem witch trials are common against us, but we still operate freely. The mob mentality just proves that the Devil is MAD at our stand and that he uses dupes that call themselves "Christian" to do his dirty-work.

Did You Know...

Many spiritual/religious movements in times past that were called "cults", today are actually part of the accepted Church? Such is REVOLUTION. America has been full of "cults" and revolutions.

FOR YOUR INFORMATION: adapted from Cults: Origin of our Culture, by Steven Fuson

A FASCINATING WORD STUDY can be done involving the words CULT, CULTIVATE, and CULTURE. Take this short semantic journey. It will provide some "eye-openers."

All three terms are derived from Latin. CULT comes from "cultus," which means "worship," and this primitive root evolved to "colere," which means "to cultivate." Right away some intriguing possibilities become obvious. Juxtaposing "worship" and "cultivate" opens the door to the origins of all religious movements. One cannot help but to reflect on the Garden of Eden imagery wherein man and woman experienced their sacred worship as an integral aspect of cultivating the Garden. In respect to the Garden, the man was instructed to "dress it" and to "keep it". His sense of worship and his walk with Deity were inextricably united with his responsibilities to cultivate his Edenic estate. Here was the birth of religion. If there had existed a status quo [status quo-"the existing condition: state of affairs"; see COLLEGE DICTIONARY, Houghton-Mifflin Company, Boston, 1984] in Eden, then certainly this original religious endeavor would have been viewed as a cult.

In a strictly spiritual dimension, there must be a sowing of seed-ideas into other earthen vessels of flesh and blood. After the seed is sown into open, fertile minds, then begins the cultivation, bringing the seed to germination, tender young plants to be watered and tended-"to dress it and keep it." Eventually a mature crop is harvested. Mature members of the religious movement, in like manner, sow seed-ideas in others, keeping the growth cycle alive and their religion on the increase.

If every religion has its start according to this universal pattern, then each and every religion, in its origin, could be referred to as a cult. Each religious cult had its founder, leader, father, the master seed-sower-and to this dynamic mentor came an original group of disciples and followers. This original group was the first planting. Their spiritual lives were watered and cultivated. In time they became seed-sowers producing a geometric increase in their religious movement: generations of believers, harvest after harvest.

This extended metaphor, if universally true of the growth of religious movements, can also be applied to other "fields" of human endeavor. For it appears that all movements, whether they be political, religious, economic or scientific "in nature," fit the reproductive cycle implied by the "root meaning" of the word cult. Does this mean that all new movements can be considered cults in their beginning stages?

One of the dictionary meanings cult-"OBSESSIVE DEVOTION TO A PERSON, PRINCIPLE, OR IDEAL"-is often construed as a negative aspect of groups deemed as cults. Using the garden analogy again, one can reasonably question whether or not the gardener shows excessive devotion by spending long hours in the hot sun weeding his precious plants...on his knees, head bowed, a worshipful pose. Were the founding fathers of America obsessive in their devotion to the "ideal" of a new nation according to the "principle" of democratic freedom? These founding fathers pledged not only their worldly goods but their lives for this cause. Excessive? Maybe to the English authorities. Certainly not to history.

Were the disciples of Ghandi excessive in their loyalty to their mentor and his "principle" of pacifistic resistance to status quo tyrannies? Maybe they were excessive to the capitalistic overlords. It was this "excessive devotion" that helped create political hostilities and bloodshed and so much pain, and yet this same devotion was key to the success of India's ultimate independence.

Shall one conclude that the "obsessive devotion" is part of the negative tag that goes along with the smear-word "cult"? A group's devotion is only obsessive to those comfortable and satisfied with the way things are. To those who are well-conformed to the status quo, the obsessive quality of each new cult is something to fear...to hate...to destroy.

Another dictionary meaning of cult-"AN EXCLUSIVE GROUP OF PERSONS SHARING AN ESOTERIC INTEREST"-is also used in a derogatory manner. Howbeit, physicists who study the origins of the universe form an "exclusive group." And with unusual intensity they explore the invisible world of neutrinos and quarks. This appears to be an "esoteric interest." Such scientists speak to one another in their own secret code, using terminology foreign to all except true initiates. They exchange documents filled with indecipherable symbols and equations. Is there a devious plot here? How can anyone know for sure? If it's exclusive and it's esoteric, it most obviously must mark the physicists as a cultist group. They manifest the markings of a cult. How dare they be different from the general run of humanity!

And this same suspicion, by the law of association, must also be applied to cults of scientists known by their aliases:

BIOLOGISTS: their exclusive conventions arouse suspicion.

PALEONTOLOGISTS: what are they really doing with those old bones?

ZOOLOGISTS: no normal person cares that much about animals!

CHEMISTS: everyone knows how dangerous chemicals are, don't they?

ASTRONOMERS: anyone that is obsessed with outer space must be strange. et cetera....

Politicians are another exclusive lot. Even the Conformed Masses realize that politicians are possessed by "esoteric interests"-their agendas are obviously not in the interest of normal folk-and their inclination to do much hurt gives rise to suspicion. Their incomprehensible speeches...their secret committee meetings. . .wonder why no one has called the politicians a cult? Or are they the status quo?

Much suspicion is due the preachers with their rabid devotees, their exclusive sects, their esoteric interpretation of the unfathomables....

Enough! Such tongue-in-cheek examples are only meant to stir the mind to think beyond the stereotypes.

Referring again to the semantic study of CULT, CULTIVATE, and CULTURE, one can see that the original planting of any new movement is a cult. It's newness sets it apart as different.

But the planting will not grow without proper care and nourishment. Hence the need to cultivate. Interestingly, the word "cultivate" derives from the same Latin roots as "cult"-cultus and colere-meaning "to till." When reading the definitions for CULTIVATE, keep in mind their symbolic implications.

* To prepare and improve land, as by fertilizing or plowing for raising crops: TILL.1 Or for raising political and religious movements....

* To nurture

This applies to all aspects of life. Everything in its infancy must be nurtured if it is to sustain growth.

* To form and refine, as by education.

Here the agrarian symbolism yields to the development of social institutions. The original birth, the planting, the cult, is not enough. As a movement grows it gains acceptance by the status quo. In time it becomes a part of the Istatus quo. To reach this point the movement develops methods of education to more efficiently inculcate its beliefs and practices. It is ironic that total success by a cult means total inter-meshing with status quo society. Tenets of the cult, once offensive to the establishment, are adopted into the mainstream. Enculturalization, accomplished through various blendings and compromises by the cult and the dominant culture, eventually produces a true synthesis of the two.

NOTE 1: TO CULTIVATE and TO TILL: once again the terminology hearkens back to Eden's Garden. After mans default, it is written: "Therefore the Lord God sent him forth from the Garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken" (Gen. 3:23).

The Hebrew words for TO TILL mean: to work, to serve, ENSLAVE, KEEP IN BONDAGE. Was mankind's destiny herein sealed to the ceaseless endeavors of the starting of cults? Looking back, history says, Yes indeed, humans are forever locked in the reproductive cycle of movements that have an origin (planted), are cultivated (tilled), reach maturity, then die and fade away. Man is apparently enslaved in these magnificent endeavors. The Conformed Masses of all ages are kept in perpetual bondage in this effort to till, to till, to till religiously, politically, economically, ad infinitum.

This leads to the third part of the semantic study, that of CULTURE. Again, the root word for "culture" is the Latin "cultus"-identical to its usage in "cult" and "cultivate." Cult refers to any dynamic movement in its initial stages of growth. This is the period of its greatest nonconformity and uniqueness. Cultivation refers to the particular methods used to nurture the developing cult. If the efforts in cultivation are successful, this implies a gradual acceptance by society. To some important degree, large or small, the cult has made a lasting influence upon the status quo. At this point the cult has become an integral feature of culture, and is indeed accepted and recognized part-and-parcel with the culture in question.

* CULTURE: The totality of socially transmitted behavior patterns, arts, beliefs, institutions, and all other products of human work and thought typical of a population or community at a given time. (Refer to dictionary.)

This broad definition leaves plenty of room for the specific contributions of manifold cults. The profound impacts of cults upon evolving society make up the composite wholeness referred to as culture.

Notice again the semantic association with agriculture (literally, culture of the field):

* Cultivation of soil: tillage

*The growing of plants or breeding of animals, especially to produce improved stock (author's italics).

Horticulturists introduce radically genetic hybrids with the hope of producing improved stock. It is common practice to "cross" two varieties of extremely unlike characteristics. Out of such dynamic genetic crosses emerge the marvelous assortment of fruits and vegetables available to the modern consumer. This blending of vegetative extremes and its resultant cornucopia of improved stock is an analogy to the vast possibilities set in motion when conformed culture meets non- conformed cult. The blending of such "crosses" produces the on-going saga of societal development.

Cults, therefore, have proven to be invaluable in the evolution of every culture. Our American culture is indeed the grand syntheses of cult influences. Let it suffice for now to illustrate the positive potential of cults and to issue an admonition to beware the negative stereotypes.

Raging Controversy

Raging controversy surrounded Jesus and His followers way before the word "cult" was used in. excess. Raging controversy has always surrounded true followers of Christ.

Derogatory "news" travels fast. Had there been mass media in Jesus' day like there is today, the word of the accusers could have been spread faster-along with lots of "blessed persecution".

When people are scared of a cult, they naturally exaggerate (following Satan's inspiration), imagine evil, have confounded suspicions, spread false rumors, etc. True, there are real, dangerous "cults" and groups out there, but let the fruit speak for itself, not what someone merely says about them.

Revolutionary Change

Revolutionary change has literally transformed the whole American society. Get used to more change-both good and bad. Tradition and conformity have taken on new dimensions. Practices and teachings have changed. Echelons of demonic powers are re-imaging the family unit, the State, and certainly the Church.

The American establishment has been challenged and changed by militant homosexuals and numerous other bad and sinful elements.

Revolutionary Zeal

Jesus was a true REVOLUTIONARY in His day. Should not we be the same? Why are we afraid to stand for sound Biblical teachings today? Were not Jesus and His troops innovators and non- conformists? Did not He challenge the backslid generation of His day? Were not He and they persecuted for doing good, not evil? Did not the "religious" of His day give Him/them lots of derision and ridicule? So, dear frightened churchites, WHY DO YOU CLAIM HIS NAME YET REFUSE TO FELLOWSHIP HIS/THEIR PERSECUTIONS AND SUFFERINGS? Are you a coward?

Wrath Of The Authorities

Again, we have faced the wrath of both secular and religious authorities. I could tell you plenty of "scary" true stories here, but space limits it. No matter what,

we must still stand for what we believe is true, pure, and noble.

We just refuse to succumb to the wishes of our enemies. Sorry about that! We have a tremendous conviction in which we live and operate by. We believe it is our duty to be committed and courageous in our service to our Master and King. We will not, I repeat, WILL NOT BE BOUGHT OFF!
 

How Offensive!

Trying to live according to the Bible in an evil and adulterous generation is highly offensive. In fact, it offends the modern sensibility of both Churchianity and State-ism (Political-Correctism). This of course puts people like us in a despicable and dangerous situation. For both the religious people and the State see us in view of THEIR PREJUDICES, PERCEPTIONS and MISCONCEPTIONS. But we can only say, "We are committed to following Jesus and His teachings."

"They Hated Me..." (John 15:25)

Jesus

If Jesus was HATED, and He was, it goes to reason His followers will be hated-even today. Why should It is a we think being labeled a "cult" is evil? privilege.

Jesus' calm, unwavering resolve, in the face of wrathful, hateful hierarchical leaders, ought to give us hope for our own trials.

If Jesus' accusers ritualistically chanted "Crucify Him!", should not we expect the same today to come against His people? Frankly, I'm amazed at the LACK of persecution directed towards the Church today. For the most part, the modern Church is BACKSLID AS HELL!-this is the reason for the lack of persecution.

Sin is accepted, holiness hated. By modern religious and psychiatric standards, if you're not a sick pervert of some kind, you are abnormal.

Labeled As "Hatemongers"

This is laughable for sure! Most, and I say most of our accusers label us as "hatemongers"; but they, like the religious of Jesus' day, are the ones who are full of hatred and murder. I'm not exaggerating. We've had our share of life threats by so-called "Christians".

"Group Dependency"

Our accusers accuse us of wanting "power over people". If we wanted this, we would not use religion. There are other means out there to have "power over people".

We turn away thousands of people who want to come here to live. And we do not extort $$ out of them as do churches. In fact, we make it HARD on the flesh to live the way we live, knowing full well that most people will NOT want to live as we do.

However, we do demand group unity for the Gospel's sake. The Bible demands that. Read it yourself. We work as a team (read John 17:21). We strive for" oneness" and we do not need to use guilt manipulation or threats of Hell as we're accused of doing. Jesus was dependent upon His Father (see John 8:28; 5:19). Is it a sin to be dependent upon His Spirit today?

Obsessed With Control

If we were guilty of the above, why do we DISMISS sinning members (as some of our ex-members well know, and this is why they are mad as Hell against us!!), and why do we REFUSE unrepentant or sinning inquirers? In reality, most of our enemies are guilty of wanting to control others, not us. We are looking for a FEW GOOD SOLDIERS.

All this Cult Hysteria proves one thing: the status quo and Churchianity fear and despise that which they CANNOT CONTROL. Try that one on.

If the fearful cannot get us all to bow to their sickly and fearful ways (and they do try), they will always form a conspiracy against the leadership. This conspiracy against the leadership aims at accusing the leaders (and the whole group) of conspiracy. Pretty neat, hugh?

Once a group is labeled a "cult", this necessitates the attempt to discredit and destroy it. Thank God we have been kept over the years. The ways and means to destroy us have been numerous, but we are still here by the grace of our great God.

Since You Can't Destroy Us...

Since you can't destroy us, why not join us? You too can become rabid devotees in an exclusive cult...and learn esoteric interpretations of Scripture. You too can become obsessed with reaching the lost with the Gospel of Jesus Christ. You too can proudly wear the ACMTC uniform. You too can explore the neutrinos and quarks of aggressive truth and expose this sin-sick world.

    ________________________________________________________________________________________________

"Smear and Fear… the Generals"

By: Gen. Jim -- 12/22/18

It all started in 1983 when the BIG stuff started coming down. Fort Freedom (ACMTC’s Fire Base for missions outreach in downtown Sacramento, CA.) had been established and missions planning was underway when the local media (later, national media) started their “campaign,” a better word for it was “crusade,” a hostile/zealous crusade, headed up by the Sacramento Bee Newspaper and Ch.13 TV. et al. We were singled out above the 300 plus churches in the area as a “dangerous cult!”

What caused this outrageous crusade? One word: FASTING! (Look it up in your Bible, see how many times it is used). It was not new to us (me and Gen. Deborah, my wife). In our previous church organization of 5 years, we fasted every week. Even before we joined a church (1972) we fasted every Saturday and read the bible. During our Organization pastoral/missionary training we were required to fast – only water – once a week. But there were other fasts we did in those 5 years: the Daniel’s Fast = 10 days on one sparse meal of a few vegetables a day with nothing but water to drink. No meat, no bread, no sweets of any kind (see the Biblical Daniel’s fast); the Ezekiel's fast = 21 days of only 12 oz bread for the men and 10 oz for the women, with water only!

As stated in other articles, my wife had a tremendous (Spirit) prayer life in which she spent hours each day in hard intercession/travail. This brought the presence of God into our midst in a most profound way. She would share with me many things the Holy Spirit was telling her that was going to happen, who, what, when, where and how. We both were amazed at the way the Spirit was moving. We were warned of many things that later came to pass. I could write a book on how the Spirit moved in those days (later continued to move on as we moved to other locations throughout the years).

It was fasting and prayer (by both of us and many of our soldiers/officers who did the same) that brought such “miracle power” in our corps, and, naturally much painful persecutions.

As my title says, “Smear and Fear!” We were smeared by the media/local churches and this rippled down to the local populations. Fort Freedom became THE TARGET in the 1980’s. We were branded as a “dangerous cult” by CAN (Cult Awareness Network) headed up by such Christ hating people as Rick Ross (Jewish) who later became famous for the Waco, Texas burn down in the 1990’s. It was his input that caused the US government to destroy the Waco compound – murdering dozens of men/women/children – shot and burned alive. He carried his crusade against the ACMTC, me and my wife especially, up to Oregon and here to New Mexico. His tyrannical, despotic attacks were aimed at us to DESTROY us.

But back to Sacramento CA, the stigma a “cult” cause the city (eventually a nation) to fear us. Smear and Fear! Many media outlets climbed aboard the “kill-the-cult train! Their machination crusade was the propulsive exacerbation that has led to where we are today – jail/prison. The media to this very day maligns and vilifys us. ACMTC’s altruism is mocked as if evil.

Because we were “Biblically Correct,” we were branded as being intolerant, bigoted, and biased. True! If were compared to “Political Correctness” of both (liberal) church and state. When we stood against the sin of Sodomy, even adultery, we had just gone too far. So, Sacramento (and the state of CA.) said they would not tolerate intolerance. Period! Hence, we were placed on the “misguided ideologue” list.

Well, this WAR aganist us only increased the power of God in our midst and our zeal for the Lord Jesus who saved us and commissioned us (Matthew 28:19). When we knew that God had spoken to us to take the “Army” message to the Philippines (Luzon; later to the remote areas where the (communist) New People’s Army was holding out, in which our engineer corps built a camp), we, Gen. Deborah and myself prepared ourselves by going on a long fast.

We stared with a 7 day cleansing fast of certain herbs with water only; no food. From there we went into the 21 day Ezekiel fast. Next we went onto water only – I went 21 days and Gen. Deborah went, I think, 10 days more on water. We both dropped weight as expected. When I finished my 21 day water fast I went onto the 10 day Daniel fast; Deborah did the same 10 days later. I can’t even begin to describe to you the presence of the Spirit in our personal lives and in our corps. Many of our soldiers/officers did some fasting at this time.

Gen. Deborah’s fame (I can’t think of a better word) spread abroad. We had people coming from all over the state to get prayed for – for (demonic) deliverance and physical healings. We saw dozens and dozens of supernatural miracles. Unbelievable ones! The local TV./radio/newspapers picked up on this as did the local (dead) churches. The persecution mounted – into mobs that surrounded Ft. Freedom for weeks at a time.

(See the many newspaper articles in our possession). Gen. Deborah often gave a personal word/prophecy over a person when they submitted to prayer/deliverance. She said things to them that they only knew about (see 1 Corinthians 12). This in turn caused a backlash. The enemies of the supernatural gifts and of us in particular, started the “Deborah is a witch” crusade. They claimed she was a witch who used witchcraft (meaning the spirit in her was real!) She was called a soothsayer, a sorcerer, spell caster, or medium, a spiritist, a diviner, even a nec-romancer! But the miracles could not be explained or refuted by the mob. Deborah only used the names Jesus, Jesus Christ, and the Lord Jesus in her prayers. To this day she has this gift.

As the years rolled on the persecutions grew. We were later told by the Sacramento police that they were assigned to watch over us. One officer told me that every time we took our (converted Greyhound) bus out of town they followed us. But the violence against us increased. In one night alone 17 tires were slashed on our vehicles. That bus I mentioned, someone poured a 5 gallon of paint on it – after we had just had it painted. Curses, rocks thrown, members threatened, windows broken etc. This went on from 1983 (when the first Sacramento Bee article was written until we left CA. in 1989.

The Spirit of God told Deborah to stop driving for her life was in danger. She never drove again.

So, dear readers, you want to be a “no compromise” Christian? You want a spirit prayer life? You want to stand-in-the-gap for Jesus? You want to preach against the sins that engulf societies? You want to fast and pray for souls? If you embrace the cross you’ll certainly embrace death!

Do you really want to hear what the Spirit says? What if the Holy Spirit told you to take Jesus to all the world? Would you go? Would you risk your life, your family, your reputation?

Is opposition a good or bad sign for Christians? For sure one will find a way of the Spirit very unpleasant to the flesh. Such aggressive, determined warfare will raise HELL’s demons against you. Once the WAR has commenced there should be no turning back!!!

Onward!

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

America's Golden Calf: The Constitution

"The law of the LORD is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the LORD is sure, making wise the simple. The statutes of the LORD are right, rejoicing the heart: the commandment of the LORD is pure, enlightening the eyes. The fear of the LORD is clean, enduring for ever: the judgments of the LORD are true and righteous altogether. More to be desired are they than gold, yea, than much fine gold: sweeter also than honey and the honeycomb. Moreover by them is thy servant warned: and in keeping of them there is great reward" (Psalm 19:7-11).

ONE RESEARCHER and author has said: "Most modern-day law is Perfect, but few of them believe these verses have any practical value today." He goes on to say: "Most of today's Christians are antinomian." Antinomian means: "a person who maintains that Christians are FREED from the moral law by virtue of faith and grace." Boy, that sums up 95 plus percent of those calling themselves "Christians."

My reason for this article (and the DVD teachings by the same title) is to show (prove!) that America is GUILTY of idolatry...BIG TIME IDOLATRY-the same kind of idolatry that ANGERED the LORD GOD back in antiquity. When God called Israel out of Egypt (Ex. 13:3), and sent them towards the "Promise Land" (Canaan), He made a covenant with them (Ex. 34:10-17) specifically dealing with idolatry: "For thou shalt worship no other god: for the LORD, whose name is Jealous..." (v. 14). We all know the story: "These be thy gods, O Israel, which brought thee up out of the land of Egypt...they have turned aside quickly out of the way which I commanded them: they have made a MOLTEN CALF (golden), and have worshiped it..." (Ex. 32:8). The first writing by God Himself was that of the 10 Commandments (Ex. 20); the first commandment was "Thou shalt have no other gods before me" (v. 3), followed by "Thou shalt not make unto thee any graven image..." and the next was: "Thou shalt not bow down thyself to them, nor serve them..." (v. 5). Well, Israel did not listen, and they made their "GOLDEN CALF" and worshiped it-provoking the LORD's anger and Moses' anger (Ex. 32:11, 19) who destroyed their idol (v. 20).

U.S. Constitution = America's Golden Calf!

Both the non-Christians and "Christians" have literally idolized the United States (U.S.) Constitution. I explain my position in the DVD series: God had me to break with the U.S. government back in the late 1980s.

There are 3 main points I cover that PROVE to us that the United States Constitution is NOT a Christian Constitution, but in truth, one that is PAGAN! (or Humanistic).

1-Preamble

"We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America."

Those three words spell out new America's god-"We The People." The LORD (Yahweh) was formally abandoned in favor of this new god. 'We The People' became America's national god. Before this, the 13 Colonies had God (of the Holy Bible) as their God.

Pre-Federal Constitution

If you doubt what I write, read "History of the United States" by John Clark Ridpath (4 vols., NY, NY: The American Book Company, 1874, vol. 1. p. 181). Here is an excerpt:

"In June of 1639 the leading men of New Haven (CT) held a convention in a barn and formally adopted the (Holy) Bible as the Constitution of the State. Everything was strictly conformed to the religious (Christian) standard. The government was called the House of Wisdom...None but church (Ekklesia) members were admitted to the rights of citizenship" (remember this stipulation). In reality, the pre-U.S. Constitution was Christian, not pagan/humanist. Thusly, when the appointed time came around, the 13 states had this in place:

a-the government was Christian;

b-the culture was Christian.

After the Federal Constitution became "law," the U.S. was still mostly a Christian culture, but had a humanist government. The Colonies' Bible based government is what the Puritans/Pilgrims had wanted...and got!

Looking at This New god

"We The People" became the new god of the new America. Now, examine the next line: "...in order to form a MORE PERFECT union..." Pray tell me how Constitutionalists see this as "divinely inspired"? It is a fact that the source of law is the "god" of that society.

"Theocracy," according to "Webster's College Dictionary" (New York, NY: Random House, 2000, p. 1356) means: [A] form of government in which God or a deity is recognized as the supreme ruler..."

So, Old America was a Biblically-based Theocracy; New America is a humanist-based theocracy. There is much that could be stated here, but let's press on. I suggest one dig into the past history of America. For instance, “We whose names are underwritten do whereby solemnly in the presence of Jehovah incorporate ourselves into...will submit our persons, lives and estates unto our Lord Jesus Christ, The King of kings, and Lord of lords, and to all those perfect and most absolute laws of His given in His Holy Word of Truth, to be guided and judged thereby” (Portsmouth, RI, Compact, 1638). This is merely ONE. There are dozens like it that mention the Lord Jesus Christ, and the Holy Bible. Now, just where do we find anything of a sort that would make the United States Constitution Christian? Not a word except: "In the year of Our Lord" (the 17th day of Sept., 1787). This is the ONLY place we find anything Biblical. Article 7 concludes the United States Constitution as originally proposed and attested to by 40 signatories, ratified by "the people" of the states on June 21, 1788. There is NO WAY one can take "In the Year of Our Lord" as making the United States Constitution "Christian." EVEN PAGANS USED THAT PHRASE.

Why can't we find anything Christian in the Convention minutes, in the copious Federalists Papers, or in the Constitutional framers personal letters where they laid claim to personal salvation?

The Fact!

Biblical Christians who were opposed to the United States Constitution during the process of ratification debates made a big adieu because it FAILED to MENTION anything Christian or Biblical. If the United States Constitution was indeed "Christian," why not mention, at least, Christ?

Now, back to: "...in order to form a more perfect union..." Just what did the designers mean: "a more perfect union"? What was meant by this was that NEW AMERICA WOULD NOT HAVE THE BIBLE OR GOD AS ITS HEAD. Ps. 19 (v. 7) tells us that God's law is PERFECT...what the pre-New America, America held to and believed in. What these seditious/treasonous men had in mind was MORE PERFECT than that of the Articles of Confederation. But in reality, a FAR LESS PERFECT union...as we see today.

What about: "...and secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves..."? Americans, from the cradle to the grave, have been brainwashed to believe that, thanks to that "godly" Constitution, America is the FREEST nation in the whole-wide-world.

Listen To Patrick Henry:

...I say our privileges and rights are in danger...the new form of Government...will... effectually...oppress and ruin the people...In some parts of the plan before you, the great rights of freemen are endangered, in other parts, absolutely taken away... There will be no checks, no real balances, in this Government: What can avail your specious imaginary balances, your rope-dancing, chain- rattling, ridiculous ideal checks and contrivances?...And yet who knows the dangers that this new system may produce: they are out of the sight of the common people: They cannot foresee latent consequences...I see great jeopardy in this new Government (see "Speeches of Patrick Henry," June 5, 7, 1788). In contrast to the federalists' failed predictions, this and nearly everything the anti-federalists forecast about the Constitution has come true.

Zoom to 2015 (Year I wrote this.)

"...They cannot foresee latent consequences." You were RIGHT PATRICK HENRY!! Our "freedoms" are being stripped year-by-year.

What we have seen so far is that the new United States Constitution was DESIGNED by our "great Christian" founding fathers, to be a document that is HUMANIST, NOT CHRISTIAN. In my DVD series, I mention some of the "fathers," e.g., G. Washington, who was a church-goer, but never a Biblical Christian. The same goes for all the famous signers, most were masons etc. T.R. Weiland said: "Americans are noted for gullibility, and their unfounded confidence in the United States Constitution is no exception." Note this: Because the Preamble tells them the Constitution was ordained to secure their liberty, most Americans take it at its word, despite the FACT that the first 3 articles of the Constitution enslave us to an Ungodly Congress, prez, and judicial system-something the 17th and early 18th century Christians flourished without. This reminds me of what 2nd Peter says: "While they promise them liberty, they themselves are the servants of corruption" (2 Pet. 2:19).

Gov. vs. Gov.

Do your homework people. See how the pre-U.S.C. is different from the United States Constitution... Note the language especially. The revolutionary generation used plenty of references to Jesus, Christ, the Bible, God etc., but when the "We The People" generation was born, all this changed. These deceitful founding fathers "breathed not a syllable of piety" (see Alexander M. Leod, D.D., "The Character, Causes, and Ends of the Present War" (1815), quoted in Rev. D. Mc Allister, "Testimonies of Religious Defect of the Constitution" for a good review of what I have said).

God is Missing!!

Pray tell me how any document claiming to be "Christian," or "Biblical" which IGNORES Christ, God, or the Bible, is Christian? The United States Constitution contains nothing that resembles Christian. It is impossible to ascertain what "God" we worship, or whether we own a "God" at all!!

I should point out the following (T.R.W. Bible Law/U.S.C.): Although it is true that four or five weeks into the Constitutional Convention, Benjamin Franklin proposed "prayers imploring the assistance of heaven, and its blessing upon our deliberations, be held in this assembly," his proposal did not even merit a vote. Franklin wrote, "The Convention, except three or four persons, thought prayers unnecessary." This alone is an abomination to "...I will cut off... them that are turned back from the LORD; and those that have not sought the LORD, nor inquired for him" (Zephaniah 1:4-6).

Yahweh!!

"We The People," not "God of the Bible," became the power and authority over America; but even this is a delusion. We know

'We The People' are mere slaves to the "Elite" who really are in rule the Zionists/Illuminati/Masons etc. Why is it that "Christians" have to petition (beg) the U.S. Gov. for a 501c3, minister's license, or to start a church/ministry? Paying homage (worship) to the BEAST system (as a believer) is the ultimate stupidity. Isaiah 44:17 pretty well sums up all this

United States Constitution worship:

"And the residue thereof he maketh a god, even his graven image: he falleth down unto it, and worshippeth it, and prayeth unto it, and saith, Deliver me; for thou art my god."

Jeremiah 9:3-14 reminds me of what happened when the pre- U.S. Constitution was sold out by the founding fathers (v. 13 states: "And the LORD saith, 'Because they (Israel) have forsaken My law which I set before them, and have not obeyed My voice, neither walked therein; (v. 14) But have walked after the imagination of their own heart, and after Baalim ('We The People') which their fathers taught them."

Between 1639 (New Haven's Agreement to use Scripture for

their law) and 1789, 150 years had passed. I believe that God's people had grown comfortable, assured of their positions etc., and that little resistance was made to make America a Christian nation (13 states-in-union). I think most had become dull and dumb (just like the "Christians" of today).

John Milton (b. 1608, d. 1674) exclaimed: "...the Bible doth more clearly teach the solid rules of civil government than all the eloquence of Greece and Rome" (J. Milton, as quoted in Charles B. Galloway's: "Christianity and the American Commonwealth" (Am. Vision, 2005, p. 61). After all, Milton died before the founding of the Constitutional was best.

Republic in 1789, he believed, as most did in his day, that God's law if the founding fathers-whom we've all been taught were "Christian"-were under the mindset of the Colonialists, the Dem. Republic would have been Christian instead of pagan. Currently we have a prez: Muslim (who secretly agrees with the Islamic State or ISIS), Communist/One-Worlder, and fake believer (who claims to be "Christian"). This fake has taken America into the Twilight Zone of no return...all ordered by the "Elite." 2-Article 6: a, b, c

(a) All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution, as under the Confederation. (b) This Constitution, and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in Pursuance thereof; and all Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the SUPREME (emphasis not in original) Law of the Land; and the Judges in every State shall be bound thereby, any Thing in the Constitution or Laws of any State to the Contrary notwithstanding. (c) The Senators and Representatives before mentioned, and the Members of the several State Legislatures, and all executive and judicial Officers, both of the United States and of the several States, shall be bound by Oath or Affirmation, to support this Constitution; but no religious Test shall ever be required as a Qualification to any Office or public Trust under the United States. Note that "s" word-"supreme"-in 6b. Clause 2 makes it very clear that America's laws: "shall be the supreme law of the land." These framers, dear ones, were very cognizant of what "supreme" meant. In using this, these antichrist signers/founders, make the law of the LORD subservient to 'We The People' (see Mt. 15:6-9). George Bancroft's "History on the Foundation of the Constitution" (5 vols. in all, 1885, vol. 3, p. 357) states: "Here is not a transient compact between parties: it is the institution of government by an act of the highest sovereignty; the decree of many who are yet one; their law and laws, inviolably supreme... (1885). What is this historian saying? He is saying that a "supreme" law can only come from a "supreme" being a clandestine assertion, dear readers, that 'We The People' is the god of the U.S. government (see 1 Chron. 29:11, 12). Treaties/Edicts

Have we really studied the U.S. Constitution? I admit I did not-UNTIL the LORD told me (in the late 1980s) that the framers/signers compromised, thus making the U.S. government humanist, not Christian.

A side note here: "...the government of the U.S.A. is not, in any sense, founded on the Christian religion..."

(Treaty with Tripoli, of Barbary, Art. #11). THERE ARE THOSE WHO DENY THIS STATEMENT (SEE MY DVD SERIES), BUT THIS WAS APPROVED BY THE 5TH CONGRESS AND SIGNED

BY THE SECOND U.S. PREZ, JOHN ADAMS. David Barton, who has a staunch belief in pro-Christian America, agrees that this Treaty is real, yet he admits, or tries to convince us that it is not (see his quote, "Original Intent: The Court, the Constitution, and Religion," 2005, p. 127). Barton makes the assertion that freemasonry was a “christian” org. during the time of the founding fathers, but was then later “corrupted” by men like Albert Pike & Albert Mackey. The doc, “Secret Mysteries of America’s beginnings,” American Masonry can be traced to England during the time of Sir Francis Bacon (1561-1626), who is considered the first grand master of modern masonry.

Former law professor G.T. Amos makes this statement in his: "Never Before in History and Defending the Declaration": "The treaty is nothing more than a pronouncement" that 'the Christian religion' as a formal institution was not a part of the American government" (quoted in G. Demar's, "America's History: the Untold Story (1993/2008, p. 135).

T.R. Weiland asks: "If the federal government is not Christian, what is it? At best, it's non-Christian. At worse, it's anti-Christian. And regardless-thanks to Amendment 1-it's polytheistic." We'll look at this next

We're still looking into Article 6b where "the judges in every state shall be bound thereby..." So, clause 2 dictates that JUDGES ARE BOUND TO OBEY THE COURT. Hey! look what just happened (June 2015)-same-sex-marriage became the law of the land...or There are those out there who equate the United States Constitution with Biblical Christianity. There is NO WAY, folks, that this can honestly be done if we try this-to swear to uphold "We the People's" Constitution-as the "supreme" law of the land; it is the same as swearing that 'We The People' are as god (see Acts 5:29).

Bye-Bye Religious Test Oath

Only States' test oaths:

Article 6c reads: "...but no religious test oath shall ever be required as a qualification to any office or public trust under the United States." This can only be understood by looking into the "State constitutions enacted during the war [for independence] commonly required test oaths for holding public office. Protestants could hold public office in New Jersey or sit in the legislatures of Georgia, South Carolina, and New Hampshire, and only those professing "the Christian religion" could hold public office in Maryland or serve in high government position in Massachusetts. North Carolina limited public office to those who believed in God, the truth of the Protestant religion, and divine authority of both the Old and New Testaments... Before taking their seats, Pennsylvania legislators had to declare: 'I do believe in one God, the creator and governor of the universe, the rewarder of the good and the punisher of the wicked. And I do acknowledge the Scriptures of the Old and New Testament to be given by Divine inspiration"" (Adams and Emmerich, "A Nation Dedicated to Religious Liberty," 1990, p. 14). In order for new America to be pagan, Article 6c outlaws this religious (Christian) test oath. This is seldom discussed by those who claim that American government is "Christian." The very opposite is true-it has paved the way for any and all (even God/Christ/ian haters) to be part of the American government-America was transformed (transmogrifyingly so) from a monotheistic Christian government, to a polytheistic one. Even when this happened-the phrase: "Our Christian nation," realize that 18th century America was still predominately Christian The new American government was pagan. Professor Gary North's book entitled: "Political Polytheism" (1989) is a good text book for this type of study, as well as a later book of his entitled: "Conspiracy in Philadelphia" (2004), in which he writes: "...the Constitution removed religious test oaths as judicial requirements for judges and officers of the new national government. This, in and of itself, delivered the republic into the hands of the humanists. Nothing else was necessary after that. From that point on, the secularization of America was a mopping-up operation. This operation is still in progress. Those being mopped up are unappreciative, but they cannot seem to identify when the turning point came. It came in 1788." (in culture).

Who Was Responsible?

We know that the Religious Test Oath was removed, but by who? Before I answer this, let me present to you the 'Religious Test Oath' of VT and MA, which were typical during the time of the Constitutional Convention:

THE STATE OF VERMONT'S CONSTITUTION, SECTION IX: A quorum of the house of representatives...shall, each of them, oath or affirmation, viz. / before they proceed to business, take and subscribe, as well the oath of fidelity and allegiance herein after directed, as the following do solemnly swear, by the ever living God, (or, I do solemnly affirm in the presence of Almighty God) that as a member of this assembly, I will not propose or assent to any bill, vote, or resolution, which shall appear to me injurious to the people... And each member, before he takes his seat, shall make and subscribe the following declaration, viz. I do believe in one God, the Creator and Governor of the universe, the rewarder of the good and punisher of the wicked. And I do acknowledge the scriptures of the old and new testament to be given by divine inspiration, and own and profess the protestant religion. THE STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS' CONSTITUTION: do declare, that I believe the Christian religion, and have a firm persuasion of its truth... Because Article 6 outlaws the Christian test oaths required by early State constitutions, it bans all Biblical qualifications, particularly Deuteronomy 17:15: "Thou shalt in any wise set him king over thee, whom the LORD thy God shall choose..." (Weiland, Bible Law, VA, U.S. Constitution, p. 190). Needless to say, the ABOLITION of State's Constitution Test Oath began to have immediate effects on the 13 states. Non- Christians could now be admitted into government positions and public positions: Jews, Catholics, Muslims, Hindus etc. removal, by a certain race of people, allowed them access to a juicy plum, plus it allowed deists (G. Washington was a Deist, plus a high- ranking mason), atheists, and even antichrists to come in. Enter Jonas Phillips --

Jonas Phillips (J.P.), founder of Philadelphia's Mikveh Israel Synagogue, as reported in "The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia" states: "This petition (by the Jews of Philadelphia) later on proved to be instrumental in the revision of Pennsylvania state Constitution in such a manner as to ABOLISH the religious test" (see 'Salomon, Haym,' "The Universal Jewish Encyclopedia," 10 vols. (New York, NY), 1941, vol. 9, p. 324). Sept. 7, 1787, Phillips petitioned the framers at the federal Constitutional Convention: "Sires: ...It is well known among all the citizens of the 13 United States that the Jews have been true and faithful Whigs, and during the late contest with England they have been foremost in aiding and assisting the states with their lifes [sic] and fortunes. They have supported the cause, have bravely fought and bled for liberty which Therefore if the honourable convention shall in their wisdom think fit and alter the said oath [as found in the altered Pennsylvania Constitution] and leave out the words to viz: "and I do acknowledge the Scripture of the New Testament to be given by divine inspiration," then the Israelites [Jews] will think themselves happy to live under a government where all religious societys [sic] are on an equal footing…

JonasPhillips

Your most devoted obed. Servant, Philadelphia, 24th Ellul, 5547, or Sep'r 7th 1787." (Jonas Phillips, quoted in Jacob R. Marcus, ed., "The Jew in the American World," 1996, pp. 99-100).

Note: under TODAY'S JEWISH PEOPLE ARE KNOWN AS JEWS, NOT BECAUSE OF PHYSICAL DESCENT FROM ABRAHAM, ISAAC, AND JACOB, BUT BECAUSE THEIR KHAZARIAN PREDECESSORS ADOPTED THE RELIGION OF JUDAISM (TALMUDISM) BETWEEN THE SEVENTH AND NINTH CENTURIES AD. For a more thorough explanation regarding the identity of today's Jews, "God's Covenant People: Yesterday, Today and Forever" may be read at missiontoisrael.org/ gods-covenant- people/tableofcontents.php. If interested, see also "The Jewish People's Almanac" "Jewish influence on the Framing of the Constitution," 1988, p. 3 Now the Jews, freed to infiltrate the New Republic, could begin their odious chicanery to dominate it. The Illuminati Jews have a dark, secret plan for America. By getting the 'Religious Test Oath' removed, Jewish conspirators could work within the U.S. government (we have seen them increase-Wall Street bankers, socialists, One World Order tyrants, movie/TV/radio/internet/and media of all types continue to brainwash Americans towards this tyrannical NWO). Now, since 1948, Zionists fill government and public positions. (See my “Women in the Ministry” #7 where I have info on the Jewish Talmud/Univ. Jewish Encyclopedia/Zionism etc.)

Listen Up Christians!

The whole purpose of this article is for the calling of "Christians" (and pagans) to repent of their idolatry. Stop idolizing this humanist Constitution! Don't you people ever read 2 Cor. 6:14-18? Amos 3:1-3? This U.S. Constitution makes it possible for us to DISOBEY God. The true Jew, or the genuine Israelite, is the BORN-AGAIN BELIEVER WHO WALKS IN THE SPIRIT (not merely a Churchite!). Note: Modern-day "Jews" are from Khazaria, from king Bulan and the pagan peoples of the Caucasus. The pagans who converted to Judaism in the 8th century. In the 10th century, these Khazarian "Jewish" converts emigrated to E. Europe. In 1948, the Khazars, erroneously believing themselves to be "Jews," arrived in Palestine and set up the state of Israel. Many "Christian Zionists" tell us that God sent them there, but pinning down their prophetic claim, they have to admit that the "Jews" are there in DISOBEDIENCE. (Found on internet.)

1^st Amendment Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

OBVIOUS is OBVIOUS!

The first sentence of this Amendment ought to convince us that this is something of a humanist document, not a Christian one. The One can smell the paradigm of "humanism" vs. "Christianity"-forever sealed as it were, in splendid isolation from each other. The "changing" of God to god was an epoch-making event, steering America's course into polytheism. This ratifying process was definitely a HUGE step backwards-from new Testament Christology, to New World Illuminatism. But, MOST Americans are still naïve about this transmogrifying event. Most are unaware of the "unseen/shadow" government, and the wedlock between the vile and precious, the secret licentious and orgiastic rites that many government and officials engage in. Freedom of Religion, Speech, and Press church morality.

As far as a humanist document goes, the "Bill of Rights" is civil enough. But, we can't make "congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" say anything more than that; "Christian Religion" is not the religion of this new government. We can appreciate these "rights," but they do not make the Constitution "Christian." Really now, examine those "rights" and see if they are based upon the Bible-when much of what is contained in the first 10 Amendments is antithetical to the LORD's. While we believers have the "right" to our Christian religion, the pagans, and even antichrists, have the same "rights," and so on (it needs to be pointed out, that as of 2011, the Constitution has been amended 27 times, which proves its imperfection!). Also, we can truly see why non-Christians choose the Constitution over the Bible. I might add too, that most "Christians" do not like God's laws either. So, dear readers, Amendment 1 is government-sanctioned polytheism. It needs to be said here and now-and I'm not going to be Politically Correct: Biblical Christianity never could, and never will, tolerate other religions (remember Ex. 20:3?). True biblical Christianity (not "Babylonian Jesus Churchianity") cannot and will not, endorse equality of other gods. I know this sounds harsh and unloving, but God-the Creator/Lawmaker-made the rules. This is why we see such an anemic church-the Churchites have would adhere to them, compromised God's Word and defend them.

Masonic G.W.

America's idol-George Washington, was a church member most of his life, yet refused to take Communion (see our DVD series on this). While serving as first president of the U.S., Washington made this statement: "...government protects all in their religious rights" ("The Writings of G.W.", 10 May, 1789, 37 vols., vol. 30, p. 321) Was he speaking strictly of "Christian rights"? Our opponents claim that the word "religion" (in the Estab. clause) was exclusive to Christian denominations. Is this true? While the framers did not reject Biblical Christianity, they rejected a Christian nation (one needs to read Thomas Jefferson's (T.J.) writings in order to grasp all this (see "The Writings of Thomas Jefferson," 19 vols. by Albert E. Bergh. T.J. used the word "denomination" to include the Jew, Gentile, Christian, Muslim, and Hindu). Also, one might look up Supreme Court Justice David J. Brewer's statement (1905, p. 11) where he said: "This republic is classified among the Christian nations of the world..." This is often quoted in favor of the U.S. government being "Christian." But why not read what follows?: "But in what sense can America be called a Christian nation? Not in the sense that Christianity is the established religion," then he quotes the first Amendment's "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion..." He goes on to state, quite rightly, that: "all religions have free scope within our borders" (Ibid, p. 12). So, we Christians have equal religious rights, BUT, we all know that the powers-that-be are hostile to us. All one has to do is read the Illuminati's agenda, or even the Zionists' agenda, to see the handwriting on the wall: "CHRISTIANITY MUST GO!!"

We Must Contend!

It's way too late to make Christianity the "established" religion in America. The fight we must fight is to not let the demons in the land “extinguish” the light of God's revealed Word. What these demons intend to do, is have America free from religion. Other religions and secret societies have an intrinsic hatred towards Biblical morality. The "spirit" that rules America right now is a "spirit" to turn America into a GODLESS WASTELAND...and the "Babylonian Jesus spirit" is working hand-in-hand with the "spirit of Anti-Christ." The same spirit that worked within the Jewish rulership in the days of Jesus (who had Jesus MURDERED!), works today, e.g., Zionist- Judaic cult (Rothschilds, Rockefellers etc., who engineered Ordo Abchao, America's endless wars that are draining the economy, yet making some more powerful and RICH!!). Their partners in CRIME are the Bilderbergs, the Vatican, the order of Skull and Bones, the Trilateral Commission, the occult Bohemian Grove, the Masonic Order etc., etc. All these demons are at war with Biblical Christianity.

Now we have the "spirit" of Islam and the "pink stink" Homosexual movement in place-TERROR is on the move; it is time to move with God.

The Synagogue of Satan is not so hidden, for they have worked to undermine the "Christian" church here in America, using "Political Correctness" as a weapon, and branding anyone who speaks out against the "Jews" as "anti-Semitic." Any one who speaks out against the One World Order is classified as a crazy! Anyone who speaks out against the LGBTQ perverts is called homophobic, and on and on it goes. Look and see how many churches in America have fallen under their MK ultra. It is hard to find a real believer these days.

To top it off, these demons have the church folks actually supporting their agendas. And if you do not, you are called "un- American," and therefore classified as a "domestic terrorist."

STOP!

If you are a Libertarian, a Democrat, a Republican, or a "Christian" Constitutionalist, REPENT NOW. Get under the perfect law of God; stop playing the FOOL. Any fool can see that America is DAMNED-its damnation can be traced back to the country's willful rejection of the Bible as its source of authority. This all began, as I have proved officially, nationally, and practically, with the ratification of the Constitution. Sure we can find a few Biblical principles within the Constitution, America was a Christian culture at the passing of the Constitution.

On the other hand, there are laws that totally contradict the laws of God.

WE'VE GOT TO STOP EQUATING THIS HUMANIST DOCUMENT WITH THE HOLY BIBLE.

State get a divorce!

What Does Jesus Say?

Jesus stated in Matt. 6:24: "No man can serve two masters...ye cannot serve God and Mammon means money or any valuable possession, something one places his or her trust or faith in, looks to happiness/security. Jesus did NOT tell His disciples to put their faith/trust in Judaism, nor the Roman government. Did He? He told them to desire God's righteousness and His Kingdom.

I suggest forming up Biblical Ekklesias.

This is the best available.

This nation-before it became the United States, was Christian. Overthrowing the nation by revolution (force) is senseless. Even if it were possible, what would you do with all the people who do not and would not want the rule of God?? Lock them up? Murder them? This would put you in the same class as the demons who now rule. We still have freedom of religion. It is possible to have God's rule over you...if you want that. The first disciples formed Ekklesias even when Rome was in power...when anti-Christian Judaism was in power. Mere church going is really not what Jesus intended at all.

Most churches/religious organizations today, are directly UNDER the BEAST by asking for a 501c3. We are not a 501c3 community-we live according to the book of Acts (see our Ekklesia section on the web).

TO SWITCH FROM CHURCH TO EKKLESIA-THE RULE OF GOD, WILL COST YOU SOMETHING-NOT MONEY, BUT YOUR LIFE!

WE OWE OUR LIVES TO JESUS FOREVER. STOP PLAYING THE CHURCH-WHORE. GET REAL, GET OUT OF CHURCHIANITY, AND GET OUT OF THE POLITICAL CESSPOOL...NOW!!

[Extra: In 1992, former MI6 British intelligence officer, Dr. John Coleman, wrote a book titled The Committee if 300, in which he claimed inside knowledge concerning world manipulation by an occult Illuminati elite. According to Coleman, the angel in the whirlwind, or “Moriah Conquering Wind,” is actually one of the names the society members signal each other by. He states: “Included in the membership are the old families of the European Black Nobility, the American Eastern Liberal Establishment (in Freemason hierarchy and the Order of Skull and Bone), the Illuminati, or, as it is known by the Committee, “MORIAH CONQUERING WIND” … In the Committee of 300, which has a 150-year history, we have some of the most brilliant intellects assembled to form a completely totalitarian, absolutely controlled “new” society – only it isn’t new, having drawn most of its ideas from the Clubs of Cultus Diabolicus. It strives toward a one world government rather well described by one of its late members, H.G. Wells, in his work commissioned by the Committee which Wells boldly called: ‘THE OPEN CONSPIRACY—PLANS FOR A WORLD REVOLUTION.’” (PP. 159-160)

Q. Where did the Founding Fathers get their ideas that they fought for?

Q. Did their ideas come from humanism or from the Bible?

We must not forget that the Pilgrims and Puritans came to the new world to escape persecution from the Roman Catholic Church, who did believe in physical violence in the “name of God!”

The star “Sirius” plays an end time part in the “Destiny” of America, as known in freemasonry. This “star” goes back to ancient Egypt. [See film/doc. “Eye of the Phoenix: Secrets of the Dollar Bill,” the occult meaning behind them.] (2008, 2 hrs. 52 min).

 _________________________________________________________________________