Gen. James Green

“And they overcame him by the blood of the Lamb, and by the word of their testimony; and they loved not their lives unto the death” (Rev. 12:11).

T HIS VERSE, taken from the book of Revelation is very much alive today, especially in the Middle East and Africa. The challenge to be a “witness” (Greek 3144, μάρτυς, martus,) in this blood-soaked earth today is upon us, dear Christians. Thousands of Christians (as well as non-Christians) are dying yearly at the hands of Militant Muslims. Some of our very own soldiers have died/had all destroyed/been left homeless etc. over the years.

We personally have seen jihad in action in Nigeria. We personally have had our lives threatened here in the US, and in several parts of Africa…but, as the Scriptures read, we MUST NOT LOVE our lives unto death. We MUST continue to wage (Spiritual) WAR at all costs. I know there are many, many ACMTC Officers/Soldiers doing just this.



THE REASON for this article is to show our readers several “Top Secret” documents (obtained and shared with us). The first set was shared with us back in the early 1990's. The following document (#1) was sent from Nigeria, West Africa, mid-June of 1990 (a photo copy of the original). One will note that at the end of this document, there appears 3 Arabic signatures beside the Presidential Seal of the Federal Republic of Nigeria (see below).

This document was, as is shown issued by the Islamic Counsel, London, OIC, and IAO. The document reads:


(Note: the paragraph: “To ERADICATE, in ALL its forms and ramifications, ALL non-Muslim religions in member nations (such religions shall include CHRISTIANITY…”)


(Note: “To ensure the ULTIMATE REPLACEMENT of ALL Western forms of legal and judicial systems with the SHARIA…”)


The similarity between militant Islam, and militant Nazism is obvious (see our “Bloody Islam” DVD).

Muhammad and Hitler had a lot in common: both wanted complete power. It is all too sad to see millions following militant Islam; its pernicious evil way leads, not to Heaven/Paradise, but to Hell/Damnation. We need to be concerned.

THESE DESCENDANTS OF ISHMAEL NEED CHRIST, NOT ISLAM! They do not need Roman Catholicism, they need Biblical Christianity (Roman Catholicism had its dirty hands in on the spreading of hatred/jihad by Muslims in centuries past. The Quran, as already stated in other articles, is a combination of Roman Catholicism, Babylonian Jewish traditions/beliefs and Christianity [orthodox]. Muhammad was taught that Ishmael, not Isaac, was to be offered as a sacrifice).


Secret Document #2

(Note: #iii—“Place TOTAL BAN thereafter on ALL forms of worship by Christians, Ahmadiyyas and other tribal religions.”)


Secret Document #3

(Note: “No Kaferi (Christian) should be allowed to hold ANY important position or to rule this country again,” #4; see #7 also).


Now, do you believe that Islam is a religion of “Peace”?



THESE PEOPLE are targeted by the militant Muslims along with the Christians. Its founder, Hadrat Mirza Ghulam Ahmad of Qadian (1835-1905). He first published their magazine “The Muslim Sunrise” in May, 1900 (original manuscripts in Urdu). These people advocate “peace,” rather than “Militant jihad.”

It is pointed out by this sect, as they perceived “truth,” that (Al-Hajj 40-41) “God has heard the wailing of those who were wronged by killing and displacement. They are permitted to defend themselves. God is all Powerful to help the persecuted.”

What Ahmad is trying to point out (in an article I have before me dated May 22, 1900 AD), is that “…this permission was for a certain time and not for ever (jihad as defense). It was for a period when those who did not accepted Islam were slaughtered like sheep. Regretfully, after the period of the Holy Prophet (Muhammad) and his Successors, the concept of jihad which is based on the above quoted verse was misinterpreted.”

Ahmad continues: “In the Christian religion, a humble man was elevated to divinity (Jesus), and the domain of the Almighty God was trampled upon…and the Muslims offended mankind with their sword and named it Jihad.” He continues: “I wish to raise awareness about the transgression that Muslims are committing against the mankind…Islamic scholars who are called Maulavi and the way they are presenting it before the public is not correct…I believe that all the blood that is spilled at the hands of these ignorant people, who are unaware of the reasons of early Islamic battles, lies at the hands of those scholars who covertly preach such concepts: the result of which is tragic blood shedding.” Ahmad makes the point “that anyone who disagrees, they declare him ‘AntiChrist’ (Dajjal), and worth KILLING!”

This founder—who preached “peace,” came under a death edict. He pointed out that his possessions were plundered, and his women abducted.

Sadly, he does not give as honest an account of Islam’s prophet, Muhammad, whom he said “never raised sword against anyone except those who used it first.” This certainly is not true (see our articles on Muhammad’s jihad/wars). Page after page, Ahmad tries to get the radical/militant Muslims to lay down their swords, for he ends his plea with “it should be noted that I have mentioned in detail in this writing…attacking the people of other religions, which they call jihad, is not jihad of Islamic Jurisprudence…it is sin.”

“If Maulovis (Ahmad was from India) of Punjab truly oppose this concept of jihad, they should publish journals…disseminate in the tribes of frontier regions.”

Ahmad believed that both the Spirit of Jesus and Muhammad lived within him… “so I am that person who has been sent in the example of the Messiah” (taken from the “Muslim Sunrise” 2003, 83rd year of Publication, Issue 3, pp. 5-21).

And like Muhammad, Ahmad did not believe that Jesus was God; ‘He was a holy Prophet of God, a sinless man, but not divine’ (see my publication “Is Jesus God?”—free).

We thank God for people like the Ahmadiyyas, but sadly they are lacking in understanding on who Jesus was and is. The other sad thing about this sect is their honor of Muhammad, who was NOT HOLY, but a murderer, a thief, and a child molester (had a preteen wife!). He is correct in his evaluation of Islam (as it evolved), for he stated: “…to disregard the rights of the Creation of God and murdering (not just killing!) of innocent human beings became part of Muslim Faith.” He goes on to say “because of this erroneous belief, thousands (I would say MILLIONS!!) of innocents were killed by these ferocious people.”

Ahmad, on page 22, states: “So God has named me Messiah in relation to the rights of the creation and sent me in the paradigm of Jesus the Messiah. Similarly, in relation to the rights of the Creator, he named me Muhammad and Ahmad and sent me in the paradigm of the holy prophet.”

Well, I can see why Militant Muslims want to outlaw this sect. Ahmad, on page 23, says that “…my mission is to establish the unity of God in this world.” Well, neither the militant Muslims, nor the One World Elite will allow this—WAR is their agenda!



IN OUT BOOKLET “Jesus or Muhammad?” we contrast the life and death of Jesus the Christ against that of Islam’s prophet. Muslims claim that their prophet is mentioned in our holy Bible, taking the place of Jesus. Then there is Hadrat M. G Ahmad who believed he was the world’s Messiah. And there is Mizra Qadyani, Ahmadiyya is Islam’s newest sect (who are not recognized in Pakistan because they have Qadyani as their prophet).

In this writing, I want to concentrate on Jesus and Muhammad. Jesus made the claim that: “I Am the way, the Truth, and the life; no man cometh unto the Father, BUT BY ME” (Jn. 14:6). Along with this, in the same chapter, we find His Words: “And I will pray to the Father, and He shall give you another Comforter, that He may abide with you forever” (Jn. 14:16). Then in v. 17 He calls the Comforter the “Spirit of Truth.” My question is: “Is/was this speaking of Muhammad?” Muslims think so.

One thing more before we get started examining this “Parakletos” issue; Jesus also stated “I Am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the ending” (Rev. 1:8). Since (not “if”) Jesus’ Words are “TRUTH,” this leaves no room for us to believe in Muhammad’s claim that he is mankind’s last redeemer.



ALPHA IS THE FIRST letter of the Greek alphabet and Omega is the last. This Alpha-Omega is repeated again in v. 11 and cpt. 4, v. 8 (here God is called “Holy” and “Lord God Almighty”). The risen and glorified Christ speaks again in 1:17 saying: “…I Am the first and the last.”

Even the Quran claims Jesus to be without sin: how could Jesus be lying about all this first/last thing? Is Jesus God? Compare 1:8, “I Am Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end saith the Lord, which is (still alive) and which was (lived before hand on earth), and which is to come (again), the Almighty,” with the same title used in 4:8: “…Lord God Almighty, which was, and is, and is to come.”

We find this same expression in 1:4: “…from Him which is, and which was, and which is to come…” This book is a revelation from Jesus Christ about Himself to John. This revelation was communicated supernaturally to John by the exalted Christ, angels, and visions. The vision/words are apocalyptic featuring Christ’s role, not Muhammad’s, as the worthy Lamb who was slain (cpt. 5), and the wrathful Lamb who is coming back to judge the world and purge it of evil (cpts. 6-19).

The next to the last time we find the Words “Alpha and Omega, the Beginning and the End” is in Rev. 21:6. The word “beginning” does not mean that God the Father, or God the Son had a beginning, it means that Jesus’ earthly life as “God with us” (see Matt. 1:23 where the Son is called Emmanuel=“God with us”=a Hebrew term). And the last time we find this “Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end,” is in Rev. 22:13. It is speaking of the crucified, risen, and glorified Christ (see also 1:17, 18).

So, what we see from all this is the FACT that Christ designates Himself as the Living One, emphasizing that though He was dead (by crucifixion), He is alive forevermore. Whereas, Muhammad’s body is still in the grave; no doubt his soul/spirit is in Hell. We have another “Comforter”—the Holy Spirit...not Muhammad.

These Words we find in the Holy Bible—the very same Bible that the Quran makes mention of.

I’ll repeat to you once again that, over and over, the Quran emphasizes that Muhammad’s Revelation is identical to that given to his predecessors (see sura 42:3=“Thus God (or Allah), exalted in power and full of wisdom, has sent inspiration to you as He did to those before you;” “It has already been revealed to you, as it was to those before you,” (39:65); “What we have revealed to you of the book (Bible), is THE TRUTH confirming what was revealed before you,” (35:31); “Recite what is revealed of the book (Bible) to you,” (29:46); “We reveal unto you unseen things,” (3:44); (12:102); “Such are some of the stories of the unseen, which we have revealed unto you,” (11:49); “These are what your Lord has revealed to you,” (17:39). So, dear ones, Muhammad reveals nothing new—why do we need him? His supposed revelations, (the many we find that have not been borrowed from our Holy Bible!), are questionable.

As stated before, there are several references to “mystical” aspects of the revelation as well (its preservation as “divine,” its “gloriousness,” etc.)—see 56:77-81 and 85:21 and 22. But Muhammad confesses that he does not know mysteries, see 6:50; 11:31, and 27:65. Both Muslim and Christian scholars question why God would give him a revelation, from a mystery (al-ghayb), if he does not understand them? Prof. J. Azzi says: “This ostensible paradox is no problem for Muhammad who becomes the conduit thru which the mystery of the hidden things are revealed.”


Is Muhammad Mentioned in the Bible?

LET’S SEE. We know that Christ’s coming is foretold in the Old Testament in several places. It stands to reason, then, that God’s Word would mention Muhammad’s name, since he claimed to take Christ’s place. And it stands to reason that Muslims would search the Scriptures for such revelations/prophecies. Since Muhammad is called the “Seal of the Prophets,” it would be very odd for the LORD not to have something said about “Muhammad’s” coming. Since the Muslims can’t find any “clear” predictions, they lay the blame on the Jews and Christians for removing them. When were these “predictions” removed? All one has to do is look at the very first originals, off the originals (in England), for proof of this.

Time and time again we have requested copies (or even a single copy!) of the original manuscripts before corruption. They can’t produce any—not one! So, how do they know this? They just lie (see C.G. Pfander, “Balance of Truth,” London: The Religious Tracts Society, 1910, p. 227).

Remember all those verses I gave you about the Holy Bible? Muhammad did not think there were “other” manuscripts that were not corrupted (although, the paradox does exist too).

All honest Muslim scholars, who have carefully studied the Holy Bible, come to the conclusion that it is divinely inspired and uncorrupt. But, why does Islam insist/persist in its attacks upon our Bible? Pride! (Ibid., 228).


Their Proof?

“THE SCEPTRE shall not depart from Judah, nor a lawgiver from between his feet, until Shiloh come; and unto him shall the gathering of the people be” (Gen. 49:10).

How do the Muslim scholars come up with Muhammad [in this Scripture]? Well, they take the Hebrew word “Judah,” and show us that it comes from a Hebrew verb meaning “to praise.” Wow!, zap, “Muhammad”=the same meaning for the Arabic name. Small problem Arabs: Gen. 49:10 shows that Shiloh was to be born among the descendants of Judah, not from the Arabian tribe of Quraish—he was not Jewish! ANOTHER SMALL PROBLEM, THE SCEPTER DEPARTED FROM JUDAH MORE THAN 550 YEARS BEFORE MUHAMMAD WAS EVEN BORN. Duh!

And, by the way, Jesus came from the tribe of Judah. The Gospel of Matthew begins with the genealogy. His purpose is to PROVE that Jesus the Christ is the RIGHTFUL Messiah according to Jewish law, by showing His descent from Abraham, from David and the Kings of Judah, and from Zerubbabel, head of the Jewish community in the post-exilic period (see also Hag. 2:23; Zech. 3:8; 4:6-14).

Jesus, as their heir of David, is Messiah (Acts 2:29-36; there is a contrast in Mark 12:35-37 (one of those supposed contradictions), where this argument is repudiated. Jews did NOT universally hold that “Messiah” was son of David, but from 63 BC on, this was the prevalent opinion. It was standard Jewish doctrine that “to Abraham and his seed were the promises made” (Gal. 3:16 and Gen. 22:18). Therefore, the rabbis would have regarded Abraham and David as high points in the genealogy.

The SOVEREIGNTY of Christ is stressed throughout history, for there is utmost care to trace His descent thru Israel’s royal line. Yet, I’ll also point out that certain names in this genealogy point to human frailty. After all, the Bible does say that Jesus was “found in fashion as a man” (Phil. 2:8). True to fact, no human birth, however “royal,” can account for Jesus; He came by the direct and creative act of God.

There is NO WAY Gen. 49:10 refers to Muhammad.


What About Dt. 18:15, 18?

“THE LORD THY GOD will raise up unto thee a Prophet from the midst of thee, of thy brethren, like unto me; unto him ye shall hearken…I will raise them up a Prophet from among their brethren, like unto thee, and will put my words in his mouth; and he shall speak unto them all that I shall command him.”

Again, Muslims assert this to be Muhammad. How do they come to this conclusion? “They take ‘from your midst’ (which does not appear in either the ancient Greek Old Testament (LXX), or in the Samaritan Pentateuch), the original text must state that the prophet would come from the relatives of the Israelites, the descendants of Ishmael, the Arabs” (Islam Revealed, Dr. A. A. Shorrosh, p. 76).

There is, however, earlier ancient Hebrew manuscripts evidence supporting the customary reading; plus, “brethren” naturally and commonly refers to one’s closest relatives (the Israelite tribes). Again, we’re speaking of Hebrews/Jews, not Arab Muslims.


New Testament Proof

THE BIBLE explains in the Gospels that this Deuteronomy prophecy refers to Jesus, not Muhammad.


Compare: Dt. 18:15 with Mt. 17:5 (see also 9:2 and Lk. 9:35)


John 5:46 says: “For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of Me”—Jesus.

Gen. 12:3 reads: “And I will bless them that bless thee, and I curse him that curseth thee: and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed.” Here we read that the lineage of Abraham will bring a blessing to the whole earth—speaking of Jesus. Can we not thank God for His blessing of eternal life for all those who have accepted Him? Yes! Can we say this about Islam? NO! ISLAM IS A DARK CURSE UPON THE EARTH.

Jesus lived and died, not to be the Savior of one nation only—Israel, but by His willing sacrifice to make “of ONE blood ALL nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth” (see Acts 17:26). Muhammad never “died,” let alone “arose,” for the redemption of men.

We find this promise again in Gen. 18:18 and 28:14. This vision epitomizes the whole wonder of the Hebrew faith and hope as they move on through the Old Testament to their culmination in Christ Jesus, not Muhammad.

Jesus, our Savior and Lord, descended from Judah (Mt. 1:1-16; Luke 3:23-38 and Heb. 7:14. “It is evident that our Lord sprang out of Judah; of which tribe Moses spake nothing concerning priesthood.” Jesus was born in Israel, not Arabia, and spent almost all of his life among the Jews.

Acts 3:2-26 speaks of Jesus. Read those wonderful verses.


What About Ps. 45:3-5?

“GIRD THY SWORD upon thy thigh, O most mighty, with thy glory and thy majesty. And in thy majesty ride prosperously because of truth and meekness and righteousness; and thy right hand shall teach thee terrible things. Thine arrows are sharp in the heart of the king’s enemies; whereby the people fall under thee.”

Islam cites Ps. 45:3-5 as referring to Muhammad, for in Islam, he is called “the prophet with the sword.” Very fitting too, for he murdered many, many people with his sword, especially the Quraiza Jews. All one has to do is read Martin Ling’s “Muhammad” (1983, pp. 229-39), where the BUTCHERY lasted all day and continued by torchlight into the night…heads were cut off, and bodies cast into a large trench (there were over 2,000 Jewish men, women, and children).


However, in v. 6, we read this:

“THY THRONE, O God, is for ever and ever: the sceptre of thy kingdom is a right sceptre.” Can Muslims rightly call Muhammad “God”?

For New Testament proof, Heb. 1:8, 9 addresses Christ.

“But unto the Son (of God) He saith, ‘Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: a sceptre of righteousness is the sceptre of Thy kingdom (v. 8). Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated iniquity; therefore God, even Thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows” (v. 9).

Verse 10 speaks of: “Thou, Lord, in the beginning hast laid the foundation of the earth; and the heavens are the works of thine hands.” Did Muhammad do these things?

Note how v. 8 describes the deity of Christ (see also Jn. 1:1). The Muslims claim that Jesus was merely a human, not deity—is the Bible wrong? NO!


What about Isa. 21:7?

“AND HE SAW a chariot with a couple of horsemen, a chariot of asses, and a chariot of camels; and he hearkened diligently with much heed…”

It truly amazes me just how far Muslims go in their attempt to make Muhammad appear in Scripture—this one is a prime example. They take the words “a chariot of donkeys” as a prediction of Jesus riding on a donkey when He entered Jerusalem (see Mt. 21:5); and that “a chariot (or troop) of camels”=Muhammad, since he rode on camels!

Surprise! neither Jesus nor Muhammad are in mind in this verse. Actually, it is a prophecy of Babylon’s fall (see Isa. 21:9!). This took place under Darius in 519 BC and again in 513 BC.




New Testament Prophecies?

“AND SAYING, Repent ye: for the kingdom of heaven is at hand.”

In Matt. 3:2, Muslims try to convince us that the “kingdom” John spoke about was Islam—the Quran being the “Law” of the “kingdom.” Christ, not Muhammad, announced the Kingdom of God/Kingdom of Heaven. Jesus said in Matt. 12:28 “…surely the Kingdom of God (or Heaven) has come upon you.” This was centuries before Muhammad (see also Mark 9:1 also). Did the Jews see Muhammad and the “Kingdom of Islam”? Give me a break!


Try Mark 1:7!

“AND PREACHED, saying, There cometh one mightier than I after me, the latchet of whose shoes I am not worthy to stoop down and unloose.”

The Muslims become really desperate now. They claim that the Muslim Gospel (Injil) of Jesus is different from our New Testament Gospels. They maintain that the Gospel of Jesus is the record of God’s Word given thru Christ…the New Testament Gospels are mere words of men! They naturally point out the above verse where Christ Jesus “supposedly” prophesied of Muhammad. This insanity only confirms to us Christians that it is HOPELESS for them to find ONE verse of prophecy concerning their false prophet.

Let’s get their exegesis straight here; verse 6 reads: “And John (not Jesus) was clothed with camel’s hair…and he did eat locusts and wild honey...” Verse 7 says: “And preached…” Mk. 1:7 speaks of Jesus, not Muhammad. You Muslims need to read Mt. 3:11-14; Lk. 3:16, 17, and Jn. 1:26-34. Christ began to preach only after John had been cast into prison and beheaded (see Mk. 1:14—compare Mt. 4:12, 17).


Changed Cities/Directions

JN. 4:21 SAYS: “Jesus saith unto her, Woman, believe me, the hour cometh, when ye shall neither in this mountain, nor yet at Jerusalem, worship the Father.”

This is another silly attempt to satisfy their “quest” of Scripture to make their false prophet foretold.

Jerusalem would no longer be the Holy City and the qibla—focus of Muslim’s prayers—but that Mecca would take its place.

Are we to believe the Muslim’s claim, or Jesus’ very own Words (vv. 23, 24)? NEITHER JERUSALEM NOR MECCA, BUT MAN’S HEART WOULD BE THE PLACE. This silly qibla is mere “religious,” not “righteous.”


Here We Are—Jn. 14

WE FINALLY come to the most ridiculous handling of God’s Word. Starting on page 12 of our booklet, “Jesus or Muhammad?,” we explore the Scriptures that Muslims allegedly believe foretelling the coming of Muhammad (study done by ex-Muslim Faris Al-Qayra Woni). Muslims CLAIM that the “Parakletos” (Jn. 14) is Muhammad. They point to John cpts. 14, 15, and 16.

Jn. 14:15-17, 25-26, and 16:7 says: “If ye love me, keep my commandments. And I will pray the Father, and he shall give you another Comforter, that he may abide with you for ever; Even the Spirit of truth; whom the world cannot receive, because it seeth him not, neither knoweth him: but ye know him; for he dwelleth with you, and shall be in you...These things have I spoken unto you, being yet present with you. But the Comforter, which is the Holy Ghost, whom the Father will send in my name, he shall teach you all things, and bring all things to your remembrance, whatsoever I have said unto you...Nevertheless I tell you the truth; It is expedient for you that I go away: for if I go not away, the Comforter will not come unto you; but if I depart, I will send him unto you.”

Since this is a lengthy study, I advise you to write us for this booklet. The “twisting” and “perverting” of Scripture that Muslims do in order to make the Holy Spirit (Comforter) into their false prophet is almost laughable. They actually use the adjective “periklutos,” not the noun “Parakletos.” The Muslim’s Arabicized “periklutos” so that it refers to Muhammad!! It IS NOT a proper noun for Ahmad, or Muhammad, or Muhmud, but a mere adjective used with a noun such as: a famous man, a well-known person, or a man with highly praised qualities. Even if it is used as a proper noun, “Ahmad,” cannot be “Muhammad.”

How did the name “Ahmad” originate in the Quran anyhow? We’ll leave it up to the Islamic scholar, Ibn Taymiyya to tell us. In his book Hidayat Al-Hayora (section 4 of vol. 2, p. 16) he writes:

“Since he ( Muhammad ) was ever-praising, he was rewarded; by being, the award must be of the same nature as the act. Thus his name was Muhammad and Ahmad.

As for ( the word ) muhammad which is similar to mukarram ( being honored ) and mu adhdham ( being exalted ), it is for the one who is exceedingly highly praised for which he is really worthy. Since he was ever-praised ( ahmad ) he became the highly praised (muhammad)....

As for the ( word ) ahmad, it is a superior verb ( because ) he was more praised than the others, that is, he is worthier to be praised than others; it is said: This ( man ) is more praised than that ( man ), that is, this ( man ) is more entitled to be praised than that. Thus in that he has the preferment to others by being the praised one ( muhammad ).

Therefore, the word muhammad entails his merit in quantity, and the word ahmad entails his merit in quality.”

It is very conspicuous that the above argument does not have much merit, because it is based on a subjective assessment. This is especially true if we compare Muhammad’s life and deeds with the rest of the great prophets of the Old Testament like: Noah, Abraham, Moses, Elijah, Isaiah, etc., or if we compare it with the life of our Redeemer—the Lord Jesus Christ in the New Testament. Muhammad was not better than any of these prophets in order to be singled out as the worthiest among them, or among the human race. A careful objective comparative study of the book of Ibn Hisham “Sirat Ibn Hisham” (The Bibliography of Ibn Hisham) with the life of Christ would help the reader to comprehend this point of discussion and to come to a different conclusion.

Linguistically also, this term ahmad may mean the everpraising one. Actually Ibn Taymiyya alludes to this point in his analysis and indicates that the people of Muhammad are the most praising people among all the followers of other religions. It is apparent that Ibn Taymiyya completely ignores the Book of Psalms, and all the songs of praises which crowd the Bible. He also ignores the Jewish rituals of their worship, Catholic chanting (even towards dead saints/Mary), and all the Christian liturgies, hymnals, and constant praises/thanksgiving.

Ibn Taymiyya was not the only one who seriously strived in vain to explicate the origin of the name Ahmad instead of Muhammad in the Qur’an. Before him, in his famous book AI-Tafsir Al-kabir Wa “Mafatih AI-Ghayb” ( The Great Commentary and The Keys of The Trandscendental ), AI-Fakhr AI-Razi of the thirteenth century, formulated the same views as he referred to other former Muslim scholars who had embraced or innovated these particular unjustifiable opinions without questioning their credibility. Later Muslim commentators such as Al-Jalalan in their book “Tafsir Ai-Jalalayn” (The Interpretation of The Jalalayn ), and AI-Baydawi in his commentary “Anwar Ai-Tanzil wa Asrar Al-ta wil” (The Lights of Revelation and The Secrets of Interpretation), relied on those expounders and echoed the same notions or even ignored the entire issue.

The silly allegation that Muhammad is the “Parakletos” is pretty bad. The “Parakletos” is the “Spirit of Truth,” whereas MUHAMMAD CLAIMED THAT HE WAS A SINNER IN NEED OF REPENTANCE.

Muslims assert that the Greek “paracleton” (helper) mentioned by Christ is Muhammad, whose name, they believe to be a translation of the term. How could this be? Dr. Anis Shorrosh puts it like this:

“The word paracleton does not mean anything at all like Muhammad. Paracleton means helper, Comforter, sustainer, and advocate. The first of these titles is clearly not suited to Muhammad, the ‘Prophet with the Sword,’ and the Quran itself denies the title of Advocate to all but God (Allah) Himself.”

He continues: “In the New Testament, the title Paracleton is directly applied only to the Holy Spirit (Jn. 13:16, 17, 26; 15:26; 16:13) and by implication to Christ (Jn. 13:16; 1 Jn. 2:1). The Paracleton of whom Christ speaks is not a man, but the invisible Spirit of Truth, who was then dwelling with Christ’s disciples, and would soon be in their hearts (Jn. 14:17; 16:14).”

Did Muhammad ever live in anyone’s heart? HA! We Christians KNOW that the Holy Spirit was sent by Christ (Jn. 15:26; 16:7), which Muslims cannot admit concerning their false prophet.

Let it be said that NOWHERE in the New Testament do we read that the Paracleton’s work was to raise up armies with carnal weapons…or, to go on the bloody offensive…or, to capture nations for God! The Holy Spirit was to convict men of SIN. His teaching was not to glorify Himself, but Christ.

So, Muhammad, Islam’s bloody false prophet, is NOWHERE mentioned in our Bible…no prophecy or prophecies, not even a SINGLE ONE constitutes a prediction about him. He is not explicitly or implicitly mentioned. BUT, Christ Jesus IS found in the Quran many times. Amen.